Weiter zum Inhalt
  • «
  • 1
  • »

Die Suche erzielte 5 Treffer.

The Possibility of Imposing a Fine on Both Parties Due to Unlawful Contract Amendment (Case C-263/19 T-Systems Magyarország) Journal Artikel

Tünde Tátrai

European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Jahrgang 17 (2022), Ausgabe 3, Seite 202 - 205

Case C-263/19 T-Systems Magyarország Zrt., BKK Budapesti Közlekedési Központ Zrt. v Közbeszerzési Hatóság Közbeszerzési Döntőbizottság, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) of 14 May 2020 Typically, public procurement rules address the preparation of the procedure or the conduct of procedural acts up to the conclusion of the contract. A novelty of the 2014 Directives is that they provide a much wider opportunity for contract amendment, thus the period of performing the contract becomes increasingly emphatic in regulation. CJEU rulings more and more frequently articulate governing interpretations in relation to contract performance in connection with, for instance, the involvement of subcontractors under a public procurement contract. Recently, the CJEU brought an exceedingly important ruling, which considers the relationships of responsibility of the parties in initiating contract amendments. The question does not concern primarily the unlawful amendment of the contract but the issue to what extent the bidder or the contracting party can be made liable for an unlawful contract amendment. In this case, the CJEU regarded it as appropriate to impose a fine on both contracting parties for an unlawful contract amendment.




Infringement of National Competition Rules and the Grave Professional Misconduct Journal Artikel

Annotation on Case C-470/13, preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Administrative and Labour Court, Budapest ), European Court of Justice 10th Chamber

Tünde Tátrai

European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Jahrgang 10 (2015), Ausgabe 4, Seite 286 - 291

The case focuses on what latitude the EU Member States might have when stipulating legal grounds for exclusion in public procurement. In the present case the connection between the infringement of competition rules and the settlement of the grave professional misconduct become explicit. In Case C- 470/2013, the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Administrative and Labour Court, Budapest) made a reference to a preliminary ruling concerning the dismissal of the Generali-Providencia Zrt.’s (hereinafter Generali) action brought before the board of appeal against the decision to exclude Generali from a tendering procedure on the ground that it had previously committed an infringement of the national competition rules.


Economic Requirements and Divergence of National Legislations Journal Artikel

Tünde Tátrai

European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Jahrgang 8 (2013), Ausgabe 3, Seite 257 - 260

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 October 2012 in Case C-218/11 – Fõvárosi Ítélõtábla

The requirement of a minimum level of economic and financial standing cannot, in principle, be disregarded solely because that level relates to an aspect of the balance sheet regarding which there may be differences between the legislations of the different Member States.

EPPPL 3|2013 Economic Requirements and Divergence of National Legislations 257 I. I

  • «
  • 1
  • »