Skip to content
  • «
  • 1
  • »

The search returned 3 results.

An Incomplete or Missing European Single Procurement Document? journal article

Insights from a Belgian, Dutch and European Perspective

Steven Van Garsse, Simon Verhoeven, Ellen Wouters

European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Volume 17 (2022), Issue 4, Page 221 - 229

The European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) was introduced as a tool that makes it easier to participate in public procurement. This article discusses how the ESPD has been implemented in some countries, what the sanction is if the ESPD is not added or is inadequately filled in. Relevant case law at the European level is also examined. Keywords: European Single Procurement Document; ESPD; missing information; irregular; clarification


Correcting Mistakes and Clarifying Ambiguities in Public Procurement Tenders: journal article

The Case of Estonia

Mari Ann Simovart, Marit Piirisaar

European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Volume 17 (2022), Issue 3, Page 144 - 157

Incomplete tenders and missing information seem to be a known constant in public procurement, confronting contracting authorities with legal challenges and critically influencing the results of public purchasing. Faced with a non-conforming tender that cannot be accepted, a contracting authority must choose between two options: to reject the tender or to ask for correction of mistakes in the tender. Exceptionally, instead of the option to clarify, the requirement of proportionality may justify an obligation to do. Subject to a complex discretionary decision, making the choice between a rejection and a clarification has to follow the general principles of EU public procurement law and good administration as well as the national administrative law rules. This article looks at the topic with the help of examples from Estonian case-law. By analysing both the relevant procedural and substantial rules, we draw guidelines to assist navigating the legal maze of conflicting considerations that concern the correction of mistakes and clarification of ambiguities in public procurement tenders. Keywords: clarification of tender; correction of mistake in tender; principle of proportionality


The Italian Mechanism of Paid Assistance in Compiling Procurement Documentation journal article

Annotation on the judgment of the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) of 28 February 2018 in joined Cases C‑523/16 and C‑536/16 MA.T.I. SUD SpA v Centostazioni SpA and Duemme SGR SpA v Associazione Cassa Nazionale di Previdenza e Assistenza in favore dei Ragionieri e Periti Commerciali (CNPR)

Marco Ceruti

European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Volume 13 (2018), Issue 3, Page 234 - 240

  • «
  • 1
  • »