Skip to content

Author: Charles Clarke

  • «
  • 1
  • »

The search returned 5 results.

CJEU Holds Against the Direct Awarding of Concession Contracts That Have a Potential Cross-Border Interest journal article

Charles Clarke

European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Volume 9 (2014), Issue 4, Page 258 - 263

Annotation on the Judgment of the Court of Justice (4th Chamber) of 14 November 2013 in Case C-388/12 Comune di Ancona.

In Comune di Ancona,1 the CJEU upheld that contracting authorities cannot directly award concession contracts that have a potential cross-border interest. Such contracts must be awarded in accordance with the general principles of the Treaty ie awarded under a fair, non-discriminatory and transparent manner. The Court has also expresse

Conferring of Jurisdiction and Implied Contractual Obligations: CJEU Interprets (Article 16 of) Commission Regulation (EC) No 111/1999 journal article

Charles Clarke

European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Volume 8 (2013), Issue 3, Page 261 - 265

Judgement of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 January 2013 in Case C-623/11 – Société Geodis Calberson GE

Within its Judgment (preliminary ruling) given on 17 January 2013 in Case C-623/11, Société Geodis Calberson GE v. Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer), the Court of Justice (CJEU) ruled that Article 16 of Commission Regulation No 111/1999 laying down general rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2

The Evropaïki Dynamiki Tale Continues journal article

Charles Clarke

European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Volume 8 (2013), Issue 4, Page 338 - 343

Judgment of the General Court (4th Chamber) of 24 April 2013 in Case T-32/08 – Evropaïki Dynamiki; Judgment of the General Court (6th Chamber) of 21 February 2013 in Case T-9/10 – Evropaïki Dynamiki; and Judgment of the Court (7th Chamber) of 4 October 2012 in Case C-629/11 P – Evropaïki Dynamiki The CJEU Confirms its Decision in Case C-235/11 P, While the GC Dismisses Extending the Scope of the EU Courts’ Judicial Review in Procurement Decisions, rejecting

The ECJ Sets Precedent on What Should Be Considered Sufficient Examination of Rejected Bidders journal article

Charles Clarke

European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Volume 7 (2012), Issue 4, Page 284 - 288

In its Judgment of 29 November 2011 in Case C-235/11 P Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (CITL/CR), the Court of Justice (ECJ) laid precedent on what should be considered sufficient examination of rejected bidders within established public procurement procedures. The Evropaïki Dynamiki (CITL/CR) Judgment was delivered on the basis of Article 100(2) of Council Regulation1 (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 and on the understanding of Article 149(2) and (3) of the Implementing ru

The Meaning and Requirements of the Term ‘Contracting Authority’ Under EU Public Procurement Law: A Critique of Developments from the ECJ Jurisprudence journal article

Charles Clarke

European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, Volume 7 (2012), Issue 1, Page 57 - 64

I. Introduction Public procurement law regulates the purchasing by public sector bodies and certain utility sector bodies of contracts for goods, works or services;1 regulation of such activities, are coordinated by EU directive 2004/18/EC.2 The term ‘contracting authority’ is a decisive element of the public procurement legal framework, as it determines the applicability of the relevant rules,3 encompassing the State, regional or local authorities, b

  • «
  • 1
  • »

News


Current Issue

Issue 1 / 2024